Skip to main content

Timeline for Is my idea of Wyverns realistic?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 18, 2020 at 18:05 history edited John CC BY-SA 4.0
added 166 characters in body
Oct 18, 2020 at 17:58 history edited John CC BY-SA 4.0
added 166 characters in body
Oct 18, 2020 at 16:46 comment added John @Kubsterrb17 only if the wings have no mass. The largest bird to ever fly weighed about ~70kg and had a wingspan between 7.5 and 8m. and soaring wings have a larger wingspan for the same mass on top of that.
Oct 18, 2020 at 15:00 comment added Kubsterrb17 Actually, average human male would only need a wingspan of about 6m. I've checked it.
Oct 18, 2020 at 13:44 history edited John CC BY-SA 4.0
added 148 characters in body
Oct 18, 2020 at 13:38 comment added John @Kubsterrb17 it is not about the strength of the muscles it is about how big the wings need to be to move enough air. Worse you want a long distance flyer which means the wings need to be long and thin. You are not getting anything that takes up less space than a Cessna while landing. 8.5 meters is how big the wings would have to be on a human that just had to lift itself.
Oct 18, 2020 at 10:58 comment added Kubsterrb17 Yeah that's why I added the part about stronger,denser wing muscles, which don't weigh as much as they should. I don't want it to be so gigantic, because it creates many problems: you would need a gigantic barn to keep one locked, and special landing zones in cities. I thought that with being only as tall as horse (about 2m) but being 4m long and with wingspan 8,5m it would suffice. But maybe I am wrong. Could you propose measurements which wouldn't be gigantic, but would be more probable? I don't care if it's heavier, as long as it's not 11m tall, and 10m wide. xd
Oct 18, 2020 at 5:31 history answered John CC BY-SA 4.0