Timeline for The entrepreneurial Necromancer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2015 at 7:31 | comment | added | Neil | @SJuan76 I appreciate the honesty, and I thank you for offering to retract the downvote. Don't worry about it though. It happens. :) | |
| May 26, 2015 at 19:15 | comment | added | Necessity | Aswell as raising the dead, binding and laying the dead back to rest would be another extremely important job. | |
| May 26, 2015 at 18:32 | comment | added | SJuan76 | I do not how, but it appears that I downvoted your answer without meaning to (perhaps I was distracted and clicked the wrong place). If you make some minor edit, I will retract the downvote. Sorry for the inconvenience. | |
| May 26, 2015 at 12:44 | comment | added | Isaac Kotlicky | @mikołak true, at that point the specific mechanics become a big factor. Do necromantic liches raise and command undead? Etc... | |
| May 26, 2015 at 12:24 | comment | added | mikołak | @IsaacKotlicky : or "who can permanently off all enemy necromancers the fastest"... | |
| May 26, 2015 at 7:31 | comment | added | Neil | @IsaacKotlicky You're right, of course. Any advantage in the battlefield, especially one as great as that would be used by any relatively smart kingdom. You'd probably see more than one in all likelihood. | |
| May 26, 2015 at 1:49 | comment | added | Isaac Kotlicky | Actually, a necromancer would be even MORE important on the battle field, raising the fallen soldiers. Basically, if you don't have a necromancer you're toast. Battles become largely a matter if "who can raise undead the fastest." | |
| May 25, 2015 at 14:38 | history | edited | Neil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 132 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2015 at 14:30 | history | answered | Neil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |