Timeline for Why would the most energy efficient shape be a cube instead of a sphere?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2020 at 22:43 | comment | added | Florian F | You could be living in a simulation. A cubical Matrix. The simulation running in a crystal. | |
| Jun 23, 2020 at 16:08 | comment | added | M. Stern | Atoms can self-organize into cubic crystals. Don't know if that fits your question, as energy efficient is not really well defined without more context. | |
| Jun 13, 2020 at 11:19 | vote | accept | Jefferey Dawson | ||
| Jun 12, 2020 at 19:19 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:49 | answer | added | Nosajimiki | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:22 | answer | added | Stephen | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 12, 2020 at 12:49 | comment | added | John | efficient for what, spheres suck for packing efficiency. | |
| Jun 12, 2020 at 12:19 | answer | added | Charisturcear | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 12, 2020 at 11:11 | history | asked | Jefferey Dawson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |