Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
L.Dutch
  • 300.9k
  • 60
  • 620
  • 1.3k

Let's Compare and Contrast

  • When comparing bone structures, Pterosaurs and Birds have lighter wings than bats because they only have one "finger" instead of a bunch of spread out fingers. Bat wings give more control over the shape of your wing which is good for maneuverability, but bad for weight to lift ratios.

  • Pterosaurs have a slightly better wing shape than most birds for being big because thiertheir wings have more of a distal tapper. By having more area closer to the body which tappers out to the wing tips, there is less leverage working against holding out thiertheir long wings straight. In contrast most bird wings are designed to more evenly distribute lift.

  • Birds also have the advantage of feathers which extend the available surface area of a wing while adding negligible mass making bird like wings in many ways ideal for larger animals. (Pterosaurs had feathered wings too, but it is uncertain if they had flight feathers.)

  • In a related question: Could my Wyverns exist? I went into a bunch of details about optimizing lift against square cube rule disadvantages, but what it really comes down to is that the bigger you are the more you need to pancake or hallow out your mass to be able to fly; so, while wings shape is important, it is not necessarily as important as answering how you can turn the most mass into wing surface. To this end bat wings may be the best because they unify thiertheir arms, legs, and tail into one big continuous flight surface.

So your Best wing shape may actually be to take the best of three worlds. Use the distal taper of the Pterosaurs, the feathers of birds, and the continuous flight surface of a a bat which together will give you something similar to this:

enter image description here

Let's Compare and Contrast

  • When comparing bone structures, Pterosaurs and Birds have lighter wings than bats because they only have one "finger" instead of a bunch of spread out fingers. Bat wings give more control over the shape of your wing which is good for maneuverability, but bad for weight to lift ratios.

  • Pterosaurs have a slightly better wing shape than most birds for being big because thier wings have more of a distal tapper. By having more area closer to the body which tappers out to the wing tips, there is less leverage working against holding out thier long wings straight. In contrast most bird wings are designed to more evenly distribute lift.

  • Birds also have the advantage of feathers which extend the available surface area of a wing while adding negligible mass making bird like wings in many ways ideal for larger animals. (Pterosaurs had feathered wings too, but it is uncertain if they had flight feathers.)

  • In a related question: Could my Wyverns exist? I went into a bunch of details about optimizing lift against square cube rule disadvantages, but what it really comes down to is that the bigger you are the more you need to pancake or hallow out your mass to be able to fly; so, while wings shape is important, it is not necessarily as important as answering how you can turn the most mass into wing surface. To this end bat wings may be the best because they unify thier arms, legs, and tail into one big continuous flight surface.

So your Best wing shape may actually be to take the best of three worlds. Use the distal taper of the Pterosaurs, the feathers of birds, and the continuous flight surface of a a bat which together will give you something similar to this:

enter image description here

Let's Compare and Contrast

  • When comparing bone structures, Pterosaurs and Birds have lighter wings than bats because they only have one "finger" instead of a bunch of spread out fingers. Bat wings give more control over the shape of your wing which is good for maneuverability, but bad for weight to lift ratios.

  • Pterosaurs have a slightly better wing shape than most birds for being big because their wings have more of a distal tapper. By having more area closer to the body which tappers out to the wing tips, there is less leverage working against holding out their long wings straight. In contrast most bird wings are designed to more evenly distribute lift.

  • Birds also have the advantage of feathers which extend the available surface area of a wing while adding negligible mass making bird like wings in many ways ideal for larger animals. (Pterosaurs had feathered wings too, but it is uncertain if they had flight feathers.)

  • In a related question: Could my Wyverns exist? I went into a bunch of details about optimizing lift against square cube rule disadvantages, but what it really comes down to is that the bigger you are the more you need to pancake or hallow out your mass to be able to fly; so, while wings shape is important, it is not necessarily as important as answering how you can turn the most mass into wing surface. To this end bat wings may be the best because they unify their arms, legs, and tail into one big continuous flight surface.

So your Best wing shape may actually be to take the best of three worlds. Use the distal taper of the Pterosaurs, the feathers of birds, and the continuous flight surface of a a bat which together will give you something similar to this:

enter image description here

deleted 84 characters in body
Source Link
Nosajimiki
  • 105.3k
  • 7
  • 151
  • 414

Let's Compare and Contrast

  • When comparing bone structures, Pterosaurs and Birds have lighter wings than bats because they only have one "finger" instead of a bunch of spread out fingers. Bat wings give more control over the shape of your wing which is good for maneuverability, but bad for weight to lift ratios.

  • Pterosaurs have a slightly better wing shape than most birds for being big because thier wings have more of a distal tapper. By having more area closer to the body which tappers out to the wing tips, there is less leverage working against holding out thier long wings straight. In contrast most bird wings are designed to more evenly distribute lift.

  • Birds also have the advantage of feathers which extend the available surface area of a wing while adding negligible mass making bird like wings in many ways ideal for larger animals. (Many dinosaurs that were once thought to be reptile like have since turned out to have feather's; so, it is very much possible, that PterosaursPterosaurs had feathered wings too, but it is uncertain if they had flight feathers.)

  • In a related question: Could my Wyverns exist? I went into a bunch of details about optimizing lift against square cube rule disadvantages, but what it really comes down to is that the bigger you are the more you need to pancake or hallow out your mass to be able to fly; so, while wings shape is important, it is not necessarily as important as answering how you can turn the most mass into wing surface. To this end bat wings may be the best because they unify thier arms, legs, and tail into one big continuous flight surface.

So your Best wing shape may actually be to take the best of three worlds. Use the distal taper of the Pterosaurs, the feathers of birds, and the continuous flight surface of a a bat which together will give you something similar to this:

enter image description here

Let's Compare and Contrast

  • When comparing bone structures, Pterosaurs and Birds have lighter wings than bats because they only have one "finger" instead of a bunch of spread out fingers. Bat wings give more control over the shape of your wing which is good for maneuverability, but bad for weight to lift ratios.

  • Pterosaurs have a slightly better wing shape than most birds for being big because thier wings have more of a distal tapper. By having more area closer to the body which tappers out to the wing tips, there is less leverage working against holding out thier long wings straight. In contrast most bird wings are designed to more evenly distribute lift.

  • Birds also have the advantage of feathers which extend the available surface area of a wing while adding negligible mass making bird like wings in many ways ideal for larger animals. (Many dinosaurs that were once thought to be reptile like have since turned out to have feather's; so, it is very much possible, that Pterosaurs had feathered wings too.)

  • In a related question: Could my Wyverns exist? I went into a bunch of details about optimizing lift against square cube rule disadvantages, but what it really comes down to is that the bigger you are the more you need to pancake or hallow out your mass to be able to fly; so, while wings shape is important, it is not necessarily as important as answering how you can turn the most mass into wing surface. To this end bat wings may be the best because they unify thier arms, legs, and tail into one big continuous flight surface.

So your Best wing shape may actually be to take the best of three worlds. Use the distal taper of the Pterosaurs, the feathers of birds, and the continuous flight surface of a a bat which together will give you something similar to this:

enter image description here

Let's Compare and Contrast

  • When comparing bone structures, Pterosaurs and Birds have lighter wings than bats because they only have one "finger" instead of a bunch of spread out fingers. Bat wings give more control over the shape of your wing which is good for maneuverability, but bad for weight to lift ratios.

  • Pterosaurs have a slightly better wing shape than most birds for being big because thier wings have more of a distal tapper. By having more area closer to the body which tappers out to the wing tips, there is less leverage working against holding out thier long wings straight. In contrast most bird wings are designed to more evenly distribute lift.

  • Birds also have the advantage of feathers which extend the available surface area of a wing while adding negligible mass making bird like wings in many ways ideal for larger animals. (Pterosaurs had feathered wings too, but it is uncertain if they had flight feathers.)

  • In a related question: Could my Wyverns exist? I went into a bunch of details about optimizing lift against square cube rule disadvantages, but what it really comes down to is that the bigger you are the more you need to pancake or hallow out your mass to be able to fly; so, while wings shape is important, it is not necessarily as important as answering how you can turn the most mass into wing surface. To this end bat wings may be the best because they unify thier arms, legs, and tail into one big continuous flight surface.

So your Best wing shape may actually be to take the best of three worlds. Use the distal taper of the Pterosaurs, the feathers of birds, and the continuous flight surface of a a bat which together will give you something similar to this:

enter image description here

Source Link
Nosajimiki
  • 105.3k
  • 7
  • 151
  • 414

Let's Compare and Contrast

  • When comparing bone structures, Pterosaurs and Birds have lighter wings than bats because they only have one "finger" instead of a bunch of spread out fingers. Bat wings give more control over the shape of your wing which is good for maneuverability, but bad for weight to lift ratios.

  • Pterosaurs have a slightly better wing shape than most birds for being big because thier wings have more of a distal tapper. By having more area closer to the body which tappers out to the wing tips, there is less leverage working against holding out thier long wings straight. In contrast most bird wings are designed to more evenly distribute lift.

  • Birds also have the advantage of feathers which extend the available surface area of a wing while adding negligible mass making bird like wings in many ways ideal for larger animals. (Many dinosaurs that were once thought to be reptile like have since turned out to have feather's; so, it is very much possible, that Pterosaurs had feathered wings too.)

  • In a related question: Could my Wyverns exist? I went into a bunch of details about optimizing lift against square cube rule disadvantages, but what it really comes down to is that the bigger you are the more you need to pancake or hallow out your mass to be able to fly; so, while wings shape is important, it is not necessarily as important as answering how you can turn the most mass into wing surface. To this end bat wings may be the best because they unify thier arms, legs, and tail into one big continuous flight surface.

So your Best wing shape may actually be to take the best of three worlds. Use the distal taper of the Pterosaurs, the feathers of birds, and the continuous flight surface of a a bat which together will give you something similar to this:

enter image description here