Timeline for How could a "communal country", shared by three races with their own countries adjacent, exist and be stable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020 at 20:02 | comment | added | StephenS | A multicultural nation is naturally more powerful because it can use the strengths of three diverse populations to overcome each single nation's weaknesses. | |
| Feb 14, 2020 at 16:34 | comment | added | SinisterFellow | It absolutely could. Central location doesn't make it prime expansion territory - empires expand along a path of least resistance. Why would the aggressive nation expand that way when it could push against these two other, pacifistic nations? The central nation can have a proud military tradition that venerates those aggressive beings who fight for its independence, and whose soldiers know how the aggressive empire's people think. Those who leave the other countries might be disillusioned or disappointed with their people, rather than exiles or runaways. | |
| Feb 14, 2020 at 12:57 | comment | added | Plutian | I suppose this would work for a far-off country filled with runaways and rejects. Its centralised position as prime expansion territory would make this problematic. Especially if internal strive happens due to some people not being as "liberal" as others. I don't suppose it would be easy to build a reasonably strong country based on an unstable population. | |
| Feb 14, 2020 at 12:35 | history | answered | Joe Bloggs | CC BY-SA 4.0 |