Timeline for Way to prove you are human when the Turing test is not sufficient
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2020 at 13:51 | comment | added | FluidCode | Did you read all the articles published last year when they claimed a program passed the Turing test? Trouble is that it is so complex to judge an AI that what you have can be sentient or give the impression of being sentient. That was the problem of the test. Actually the program was not so clever, thus it gave rise to a lot of discussions and interpretations. | |
| Feb 5, 2020 at 13:42 | comment | added | Hobbamok | And your problem is that you think you've succeeded with "but before the development will get to that point it will take a lot of time." When we are literally talking about an AI SENTIENT ENOUGH TO ACT ON ITS OWN AND INVENTING DECEPTION | |
| Feb 5, 2020 at 13:40 | comment | added | FluidCode | Causal relationship imply estimation of Bayesian probability networks, the problem is that you keep confusing them with simple pattern recognition. | |
| Feb 5, 2020 at 13:36 | comment | added | Hobbamok | But to set this whole thing in motion, the AI needs to, for some reason, want to mess with (impersonate) humans. And if the AI has such a thought, its reasonable to assume that is MUST be beyond any dumb pattern recognition challenge. [Fun fact: AIs right now are already better at solving captchas than humans] | |
| Feb 5, 2020 at 13:29 | comment | added | FluidCode | @Hobbamok It seems you don't know very much about AI. What I mentioned is a weakness of current AI and it will remain so for decades or even more. The question required advanced AI, but not an extremely advanced one. | |
| Feb 5, 2020 at 12:19 | comment | added | Hobbamok | OP mentioned general intelligence AI | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 17:51 | history | answered | FluidCode | CC BY-SA 4.0 |