Timeline for Evolution of a naturally invisible predator
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 27, 2015 at 18:57 | vote | accept | Frostfyre | ||
| Apr 20, 2015 at 19:16 | answer | added | March Ho | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 18:54 | answer | added | bowlturner | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 17:48 | comment | added | Frostfyre | @Saidoro Feel free to make a case for artificial engineering as the creature's origin. I will weigh all answers with equal consideration. | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 17:36 | comment | added | Saidoro | I suppose the main evolutionary concern is why it's using that field to very precisely target an extremely tiny part of the target's brain in an extremely specific way instead of just targeting some other portion and possibly killing them outright. The described mechanism really has a bit too many moving parts which aren't useful on their own to be a likely candidate for evolution. | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 16:03 | history | edited | user |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:58 | history | asked | Frostfyre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |