Timeline for Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2019 at 13:13 | comment | added | user22613 | Why not a revolving-rod gatling? 6x smaller fireballs 6x as often? | |
| May 17, 2019 at 8:10 | comment | added | Nosajimiki | You could replace the need for drilling if you move your tungsten to the outside of the wand, reducing to a single rule violation. Probably replacing you handle with with materials like resin, bone, horn, and/or cork might also reduce your material violations with similar properties | |
| May 17, 2019 at 3:10 | history | edited | Tim B II | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
updated to reflect that it violates the rules
|
| May 17, 2019 at 2:52 | comment | added | Tim B II | @Nosajimiki - Ha! You're right, I actually went looking for tech level requirements (they're notorious in our questions) and didn't see them in the rules. I should've looked in the actual question... I'll edit up top to reflect this is an apocryphal answer | |
| May 17, 2019 at 2:51 | comment | added | JBH | You're right, drilling a hole in the wand violates World Rules, bullet #4. However, it does make for a fascinating Steampunk idea. | |
| May 17, 2019 at 2:47 | comment | added | Nosajimiki | Several of these materials such as styrofoam, fiberglass, tungsten, and liquid nitrogen violate the 13th century requirement. | |
| May 17, 2019 at 1:01 | comment | added | Tim B II | @Hoyle'sghost So, which part do you disagree with? | |
| May 17, 2019 at 0:21 | history | answered | Tim B II | CC BY-SA 4.0 |