Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 11, 2018 at 18:01 comment added jamesqf @o.m.: Actually, as far as friction/ease of pulling is concerned, steel-rimmed wheels would be better than rubber tires. (Look at railroads.) The rubber is for rider comfort, traction, &c, all of which are pretty negligible at horse-drawn speed.
Nov 11, 2018 at 5:23 comment added Kilisi dirt roads get rutted very quickly, unsure who would be doing maintenance on those after an apocalypse, very big difference, even normal rainfall on a dirt road erodes and that's just if it's being used. An unused dirt road gets overgrown very quickly.
Nov 11, 2018 at 5:21 comment added o.m. @Kilisi, most caravans would be designed to move on flat-but-unpaved grounds e.g. in a trailer park. That should meet the old tarmac or dirt road specification of the OP.
Nov 10, 2018 at 23:18 comment added Kilisi suspension designed for smooth roads does not work well on anything else.
Nov 10, 2018 at 21:09 vote accept TheLifeweaver
Nov 10, 2018 at 21:09 vote accept TheLifeweaver
Nov 10, 2018 at 21:09
Nov 10, 2018 at 18:22 comment added o.m. @L.Dutch, on the other hand modern tires and suspensions should beat iron-rimmed wood -- until they wear out and need to be replaced, of course.
Nov 10, 2018 at 17:50 comment added chasly - supports Monica L. Dutch - Draft horses were used for ploughing fields. They were pulling a blade through solid earth. Some of those ploughs didn't even have wheels attached. They would easily pull a modern caravan especially with its excellent bearings that weren't available in a wooden wagon.
Nov 10, 2018 at 17:25 comment added L.Dutch I am not so sure how the wheels come into the figure. The smaller wheels of a caravan, as compared to a Conestoga, on a non perfectly even surface would make pulling a difficult task.
Nov 10, 2018 at 17:07 history answered o.m. CC BY-SA 4.0