Timeline for How can mana absorption by a warlock lead to less than 100% overall gain?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2020 at 12:18 | vote | accept | Incognito | ||
| Sep 18, 2019 at 5:53 | answer | added | Demigan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 17, 2019 at 23:38 | answer | added | Haylen | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 31, 2018 at 14:00 | answer | added | Dylan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 31, 2018 at 3:44 | answer | added | rek | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 31, 2018 at 3:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 31, 2018 at 9:03 | |||||
| Oct 25, 2018 at 18:01 | comment | added | jdunlop | This is a magic system where you get to define the rules. So "because" is sufficient justification. | |
| Oct 25, 2018 at 17:42 | comment | added | Cort Ammon | What does it mean to you to say that "100% has been transfered," and "only 10% increase in their mana supply"? What does it mean to perfectly transfer something but not get to use it all? | |
| Oct 25, 2018 at 17:39 | answer | added | Sora Tamashii | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 22, 2018 at 1:23 | answer | added | a4android | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 22, 2018 at 1:15 | history | edited | a4android | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
The term "cannibalism" was used incorrectly in the title; reworded it to conform to the question proper.
|
| Oct 21, 2018 at 23:21 | answer | added | Brythan | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 21, 2018 at 23:10 | history | edited | Brythan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 21, 2018 at 18:26 | answer | added | Willk | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 21, 2018 at 18:21 | answer | added | The Square-Cube Law | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 21, 2018 at 17:55 | history | edited | The Square-Cube Law | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Oct 21, 2018 at 17:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 22, 2018 at 8:52 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2018 at 16:38 | history | asked | Incognito | CC BY-SA 4.0 |