Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 23, 2015 at 18:32 comment added Jim2B True, but as in several SF stories already (ala Logan's Run), it could add interesting dynamics to your space terrarium. Also it need not be in a planet, moon, or planetoid.
Mar 23, 2015 at 15:38 comment added gerrit @Jim2B The last problem already exists right now.
Mar 23, 2015 at 3:29 comment added Jim2B I agree, a planet's weather systems would preclude any structure surviving millions of years. The only place we know structures survive is on the surface of airless & dead planets/planetoids (e.g. the Moon). Although I agree that with our current state of knowledge we could not build a survivable space habitat for this period of time, imagine a giant space terrarium - filled up with a biosphere, set in motion, and sealed up from the outside. No active maintenance required. This is possible but there would still be problems. How do you keep the human population in check?
Mar 22, 2015 at 18:42 comment added jschultz410 Except that living in an asteroid probably requires all sorts of advanced technology (solar power collectors, nuclear power, CO2 scrubbers, etc.) that likely will not survive the kind of technological regression that the OP presumes.
Mar 21, 2015 at 23:49 history answered gerrit CC BY-SA 3.0