Why would the clothing equation have to be more complex than...

(Surface of Area of wearer measured in fractional square yards) S

times

(Culturally or Environmentally mandated coverage area, expressed as a percentage of wearer total body surface area) P

times

(Weight of preferred (potentially multi-layered) fabric measured in fractional square yards) W

with a small percentile addition for buttons, buckles and insignia.

...?

( so my Hard Science mandated equation would be... Fabric Yardage, Y = S * P * W )

I think the inverse square law only applies to solid objects. Not their wrappers. The private parts of a giant don't require thicker fabric to maintain decency... only more of it.

Why would the clothing equation have to be more complex than...

(Surface of Area of wearer measured in fractional square yards) S

times

(Culturally or Environmentally mandated coverage area, expressed as a percentage of wearer total body surface area) P

times

(Weight of preferred (potentially multi-layered) fabric measured in fractional square yards) W

with a small percentile addition for buttons, buckles and insignia.

...?

( so my Hard Science mandated equation would be... Fabric Yardage Weight, Y = S * P * W )

I think the inverse square law only applies to solid objects. Not their wrappers. The private parts of a giant don't require thicker fabric to maintain decency... only more of it.

Why would the clothing equation have to be more complex than...

(Surface of Area of wearer measured in fractional square yards) S

times

(Culturally or Environmentally mandated coverage area, expressed as a percentage of wearer total body surface area) P

times

(Weight of preferred (potentially multi-layered) fabric measured in fractional square yards) W

with a small percentile addition for buttons, buckles and insignia.

...?

I think the inverse square law only applies to solid objects. Not their wrappers. The private parts of a giant don't require thicker fabric to maintain decency... only more of it.

Why would the clothing equation have to be more complex than...

(Surface of Area of wearer measured in fractional square yards) S

times

(Culturally or Environmentally mandated coverage area, expressed as a percentage of wearer total body surface area) P

times

(Weight of preferred (potentially multi-layered) fabric measured in fractional square yards) W

with a small percentile addition for buttons, buckles and insignia.

...?

( so my Hard Science mandated equation would be... Fabric Yardage, Y = S * P * W )

I think the inverse square law only applies to solid objects. Not their wrappers. The private parts of a giant don't require thicker fabric to maintain decency... only more of it.