Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 17, 2018 at 14:14 comment added user535733 @Mast perhaps, but by that measure a tiny bit of extra handwaving (or magic) will solve any problem. Gotta start somewhere.
Aug 17, 2018 at 13:28 comment added Mast Considering they make something extremely heavy float, I imagine a tiny bit of extra handwaving will solve the water problem.
Aug 17, 2018 at 12:36 comment added user535733 @NicolasRaoul edited to include rain harvesting.
Aug 17, 2018 at 12:35 history edited user535733 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 247 characters in body
Aug 17, 2018 at 9:58 comment added March Ho Alternatively, you can find and poison their water source by dumping dead animals or some other kind of biological/chemical weapon in it.
Aug 17, 2018 at 9:49 comment added Alice @user535733 You most certainly do not want your soldiers drinking more than 5-6 litres of water per day, no matter how hard they work and fight and how thirsty they are. Or you will end up with pretty sick soldiers.
Aug 17, 2018 at 4:54 comment added a4android The figures I quoted are for normal activity. More water will be consumed by a fighting force. This makes your revised figure very reasonable. What I like about your answer is that is practical & sensible in terms of siege warfare. Yay for commonsense!
Aug 17, 2018 at 3:59 comment added Nicolas Raoul @user535733: I would rather say that it is an element you have forgotten to take account of in your answer's calculation.
Aug 17, 2018 at 3:12 comment added user535733 @NicolasRaoul seems like a Question comment more than an Answer comment. Calculating the amount of rain collected, and determining if it's adequate to replace usage, is left as an exercise for the student.
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:58 comment added Nicolas Raoul Don't they collect rain, though?
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:50 history edited user535733 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:46 comment added user535733 @a4android Fair enough. I've cut the amount of water in half. I think 15-16L/day is appropriate for hard-working soldiers who are constantly fighting fires and endlessly repairing damage from those durned trebuchets. Both are thirsty work.
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:44 history edited user535733 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:35 comment added a4android Attacking the water supply was used many times to end sieges. Doing the same for a flying castle is a basically sound idea. Bathing, laundry & cleaning isn't exactly Medieval. Just querying some of the details. It got my tick of approval.
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:32 comment added a4android [continues: "This does not include water for personal hygiene such as dental hygiene, which requires an additional minimum 4 fluid ounces ." Your estimate of 38 L suggests the flying castlers are awash with water. Medieval folk were less into hygiene than us moderns. At a guesstimate they could survive on 5 to 6 L daily (including cooking). However, attacking their water supply is a great way to end a siege. Good principle, but less water may be involved.
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:26 comment added a4android Consider: "Minimum standards for daily water intake are universally recognized and set at 2.5 – 3 liters per day (or approximately 85 – 101 fluid ounces). Although this may include food intake, if food is to offer a significant fraction of the necessary water intake, then the food must be comprised of a sufficiently high percentage of water, i.e. a diet high in fruit and vegetables. The bare minimum of 2 liters (68 fluid ounces) of drinking water per day is an absolute minimum and reflects survival only. per day." [to be continued]
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:20 history edited a4android CC BY-SA 4.0
Corrected spelling & punctuation
Aug 17, 2018 at 1:49 history answered user535733 CC BY-SA 4.0