Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 14, 2018 at 4:05 answer added Software_Programineer timeline score: 0
Aug 12, 2018 at 21:42 answer added DrunkenSailor timeline score: 0
Aug 12, 2018 at 16:12 answer added SealBoi timeline score: 1
Aug 12, 2018 at 12:38 comment added RonJohn The main problem with "third eye in their forehead" is that humans (and almost all animals, really) are highly bilateral. You can add third arms and third eyes in stories (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_the_Real_Martian_Please_Stand_Up%3F), but without some serious un-humanoid changeds, there's structurally no where for them to attach.
Aug 12, 2018 at 12:37 comment added AlexP Our very distant ancestors actually had three eyes. In our lineage the third eye became the pineal gland. A very few extant animals, such as the tuatara (*Hatteria punctata) of New Zealand, still preserve the third eye in a sort-of functional form.
Aug 12, 2018 at 12:11 answer added IndigoFenix timeline score: 4
Aug 12, 2018 at 11:02 comment added Raditz_35 Do you want them to be regular 2-eyed humanoids that then develop such an eye over a short period of time or do you want this to be something that developed a long way back in the evolution?
Aug 12, 2018 at 6:38 comment added StephenG - Help Ukraine Note that your eyes are recessed in a protective "cocoon" of bone to provide some additional protection. A third eye in the forehead would require similar protection but being recessed would limit it's field of view. I'm hence skeptical that a third eye in the forehead would be an advantage and think it would be a significant disadvantage. Two additional eyes at the back would be arguably more useful than additional forward vision.
Aug 12, 2018 at 5:36 answer added boxcartenant timeline score: 3
Aug 12, 2018 at 5:09 history asked serpentsun CC BY-SA 4.0