Skip to main content
corrected grammar and spelling
Source Link
Gryphon
  • 11k
  • 5
  • 57
  • 93

Are swords, spears, and arrows that turn slain enemies into pure gold useful, in medieval combat, or are they useless aside from free money?

Notes about the weapons:

  • flesh wounds don't turn people to stone;gold; they need to be killed
  • it also works on corpses

Are swords, spears and arrows that turn slain enemies into pure gold useful, in medieval combat, or are they useless aside from free money?

Notes about the weapons:

  • flesh wounds don't turn people to stone; they need to be killed
  • it also works on corpses

Are swords, spears, and arrows that turn slain enemies into pure gold useful, in medieval combat, or are they useless aside from free money?

Notes about the weapons:

  • flesh wounds don't turn people to gold; they need to be killed
  • it also works on corpses
edited in from the comments
Source Link
Erik
  • 13.9k
  • 4
  • 39
  • 52

Are swords, spears and arrows that turn slain enemies into pure gold useful, in medieval combat, or are they useless aside from free money?

Notes about the weapons:

  • flesh wounds don't turn people to stone; they need to be killed
  • it also works on corpses

Are swords, spears and arrows that turn slain enemies into pure gold useful, in medieval combat, or are they useless aside from free money?

Are swords, spears and arrows that turn slain enemies into pure gold useful, in medieval combat, or are they useless aside from free money?

Notes about the weapons:

  • flesh wounds don't turn people to stone; they need to be killed
  • it also works on corpses
Midas is a proper noun.
Link
RonJohn
  • 17.7k
  • 2
  • 40
  • 81

Are "midas""Midas" swords useless for warfare?

edited title
Link
L.Dutch
  • 300.9k
  • 60
  • 620
  • 1.3k
Loading
Spelling correction.
Source Link
RonJohn
  • 17.7k
  • 2
  • 40
  • 81
Loading
Source Link
Seraph Myrmidon
  • 4.6k
  • 4
  • 25
  • 43
Loading