Timeline for How would I limit the amount of magical bling a person could wear?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 14, 2015 at 19:56 | comment | added | Ben Voigt | Precise ingredient identification becomes another source of trouble. Does that recipe call for a sword with a magically sharpened edge? Beware that the local merchant doesn't know the difference between that and a keen sword with magically enhanced durability. Both keep their edge in battle but... | |
| Mar 13, 2015 at 0:56 | comment | added | Quentin Clarkson | @grimmsdottir That one would probably just give you the ability to drink an unusually hot cup of tea. My initial thought was that the destructive interference was more fun, but this lets you introduce a third class of magic user - the 'power users' who understand how to combine items in useful ways. And then there are those who think they know what they are doing but really don't have a clue... | |
| Mar 13, 2015 at 0:16 | comment | added | grimmsdottir | @QuentinClarkson The way there are destructive interference, there could also be constructive interference. So, you can end up with sword of fire + ring of water breathing to become ring of fire breath. Sometimes. | |
| Mar 13, 2015 at 0:05 | comment | added | Quentin Clarkson | This might also affect non-magical items. Magic ring of healing + regular sword = magic sword of healing. Oops. | |
| Mar 12, 2015 at 14:00 | comment | added | grimmsdottir | Pretty good answer, I like the idea of the ethereal and corporeal being fuzzy. | |
| Mar 12, 2015 at 13:56 | history | answered | Abulafia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |