Timeline for Humans are gone - what can I harvest from their cities 30M years later?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 4, 2020 at 19:17 | comment | added | NomadMaker | I'm not sure there is enough information left in a nanobot to encode that much data. | |
Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
S Jul 10, 2018 at 20:06 | history | suggested | T.J.L. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changed pseudo-headings to real headings for the benefit of those using assistive technologies like screen readers.
|
Jul 10, 2018 at 19:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 10, 2018 at 20:06 | |||||
Jul 9, 2018 at 8:22 | comment | added | fire in the hole | This was brilliant, just tell me what you do smoke? | |
Jul 8, 2018 at 5:24 | comment | added | user52821 | Suddenly I'll never look at viruses the same again. | |
Jul 8, 2018 at 2:43 | comment | added | Matthew Najmon | @T.J.Crowder The initial crash may well happen any day now, but actual extinction is a different matter. Even if every nuclear-armed nation on earth decided to coordinate their efforts to try to sterilize the planet, it'd only be about 99.999 percent or so who would die in the nuclear barrage itself. There'd still be hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of people worldwide, isolated a few hundred here, a few thousand there, who would be royally screwed, but would take a bit longer to entirely die out. | |
Jul 6, 2018 at 17:01 | comment | added | T.J. Crowder | "Since it will probably take some time for our ultimate demise..." That's wonderfully optimistic of you. Sometimes I wonder... :-) | |
Jul 6, 2018 at 9:00 | comment | added | DrMcCleod | Pad it out a bit and I'll buy the book. | |
Jul 6, 2018 at 2:57 | history | edited | Turtle1363 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 261 characters in body
|
Jul 6, 2018 at 2:47 | history | edited | Turtle1363 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2653 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2018 at 14:08 | comment | added | JBH | Welcome to worldbuilding.SE! This was a clever first answer, especially as we, ourselves, are only just at the point technologically that we could identify the existence of a nanobot. I'll never trust the dirt in my backyard again. | |
Jul 5, 2018 at 13:41 | history | edited | Turtle1363 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1137 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2018 at 13:32 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 5, 2018 at 14:08 | |||||
Jul 5, 2018 at 13:27 | history | answered | Turtle1363 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |