Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 8, 2018 at 10:32 comment added Raditz_35 If this is so, you are using numbers that don't apply to the scenario.
May 8, 2018 at 10:22 vote accept antweg
May 8, 2018 at 10:40
May 8, 2018 at 10:21 vote accept antweg
May 8, 2018 at 10:22
May 8, 2018 at 10:18 comment added Nick No, I am addressing the question as asked, in bold, in the body of the text. One interpretation is that the crew live on a ship for 6000 years; there is nothing in the question that suggests otherwise, and if that's what the questioner has in mind (some kind of huge generation ship) then my answer will be useful.
May 8, 2018 at 10:15 comment added Raditz_35 So you are just answering the title without considering the body? just because someone stated some numbers in a scientific sounding article talking about a completely different problem, you can't apply them to everything. That's unscientific, so no, you are not using real science.
May 8, 2018 at 10:13 comment added Nick Sorry. Disagree. Question asks "how many persons on board to survive genetically' for 6000 years. My answer provides pointers to using real science to address the question.
May 8, 2018 at 10:11 history edited Nick CC BY-SA 4.0
added 151 characters in body
May 8, 2018 at 10:10 comment added Raditz_35 Have you read your "study"? It doesn't apply in this scenario. They account for many things that would not be an issue on a build-for-humans-and-long-term-survival spacecraft
May 8, 2018 at 10:09 history answered Nick CC BY-SA 4.0