Timeline for Does my shipboard computer slow down as I approach light speed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 12, 2018 at 22:29 | comment | added | fishinear | From the perspective of you, the pilot of the ship, everything is moving towards you with 99% the speed of light. You only detect the object when it is 1.2 light minutes away because of the resolution of your telescope. But by the time that light reaches you, the object is only 0.72 light seconds behind the light. There is no "head-start", because the object is moving (from the perspective of the pilot) while the light is traveling. | |
Mar 11, 2018 at 20:44 | comment | added | NPSF3000 | @fishinear What do you mean 'object starts moving'? The small object far away from the sun would be reflecting light regardless of your movement. Just like the tree before myself reflects light regardless of our relative motion. | |
Mar 11, 2018 at 13:40 | comment | added | fishinear | @NPSF3000 A "1.2-minute headstart" would mean that the light leaves the object 1.2 minutes before the object starts moving. That is not the case, it is already moving. And so the object arrives at you only 0.73 seconds after its light does. | |
Mar 11, 2018 at 8:46 | comment | added | NPSF3000 | " So the light of these objects takes 1.2 minutes to reach you, but the objects themselves take only 1.212 minutes to reach you." But the light of these objects has a 1.2-minute headstart... | |
Mar 9, 2018 at 22:25 | history | edited | fishinear | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Mar 9, 2018 at 22:23 | comment | added | fishinear | @MichaelKjörling Sorry, yes of course, the objects take longer. Will change the text. | |
Mar 9, 2018 at 20:28 | comment | added | user | "the light of these objects takes 1.2 minutes to reach you, but the objects themselves take only 1.188 minutes to reach you" If the objects require less time to reach you than does the light reflected or emitted by the objects, then an impact is inevitable. Without having checked your calculations, I suspect that you at the very least got these numbers the wrong way around. | |
Mar 9, 2018 at 17:18 | history | edited | fishinear | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added energy estimate
|
Mar 9, 2018 at 16:54 | history | edited | fishinear | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Mar 9, 2018 at 16:46 | history | edited | fishinear | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 678 characters in body
|
Mar 9, 2018 at 13:09 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 9, 2018 at 13:19 | |||||
Mar 9, 2018 at 13:05 | history | answered | fishinear | CC BY-SA 3.0 |