Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 8, 2018 at 22:07 comment added Peter Cordes Yup, looks good, and good point about the forces on a beam sticking out past the side of the building. Thanks for writing it up with ASCII art :)
Mar 8, 2018 at 21:44 comment added cmaster - reinstate monica @PeterCordes I've added your idea to the answer now. Hope you like it the way I wrote it.
Mar 8, 2018 at 21:42 history edited cmaster - reinstate monica CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1563 characters in body
Mar 8, 2018 at 21:12 comment added cmaster - reinstate monica @PeterCordes That is actually another good idea, as it would not only serve to thoroughly separate the tanks, but also help in anchoring the pulleys: A long, strong beam would be enough as the force is the same on both sides of the building, precluding any danger of tipping over; when the pulley(s) are just on one side of the building, you would need some thorough anchoring and/or counterweight to counter the tipping force. I think, I'll add that to my answer, thanks :-)
Mar 7, 2018 at 23:46 comment added Peter Cordes Still, with two pulleys, the tank going down could be on the other side of the building from the tank going up, so cross-contamination at the bottom could be limited.
Mar 7, 2018 at 23:45 comment added Peter Cordes Interesting, but do you really want to be handling sewage that much? I'd expect some minor spillage in the process of collecting the sewage, and without a good water supply it's not convenient to just shower off, so it's more disease risk for your population even just to keep sewage sitting around in the open until its time to lower it down and use it's gravitational potential energy.
Mar 7, 2018 at 22:57 history edited cmaster - reinstate monica CC BY-SA 3.0
added 377 characters in body
Mar 7, 2018 at 22:34 history answered cmaster - reinstate monica CC BY-SA 3.0