Timeline for hypothetical criteria for non-paradox FTL
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 19, 2015 at 15:16 | comment | added | Dan Smolinske | It's a tricky paradox, I was literally thinking about it yesterday (before this question) which is where I came up with that example. I'd never liked it when explained mathematically, but was finally able to come up with a few scenarios where the logical paradox was obvious to me without it just being the result of odd numbers plugged into a formula. As an aside, I find the thought of relativistic observers causing causality violations to have interesting parallels to the Quantum Observer Effect. | |
| Feb 19, 2015 at 13:07 | comment | added | Foo Bar | Thanks. I wonder if the mere (possibility of) existence of relativistic observers is sufficient to cause paradox, whether or not they're directly involved. | |
| Feb 18, 2015 at 19:33 | history | answered | Dan Smolinske | CC BY-SA 3.0 |