Timeline for How to facilitate inter-species communication with math?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
May 28, 2019 at 20:40 | comment | added | JBH | The value of math is the ability to bridge differences in semiotics. Once that minor Rosetta Stone has been achieved, the subtle nuances of Nietzsche aren't too far behind. (OK, so "Urggle-koo-ARAN-broack" means "not equal to..." Now we're getting somewhere!) | |
Dec 23, 2017 at 7:06 | comment | added | rek | The concept or trope of math as a universal "language" does not posit that counting or doing math is the goal, but that it is a common reference from which non-mathematical communication can be built. | |
Dec 22, 2017 at 20:20 | comment | added | L.Dutch♦ | Math cannot be used to communicate "vague" concepts. Math language is either absolutely true or not defined. | |
Dec 22, 2017 at 19:08 | comment | added | Olga | I wonder why people are downvoting this answer. As you say, maths and formal logic cannot be used to convey all possible types of information. | |
Dec 22, 2017 at 18:58 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 78 characters in body
|
Dec 22, 2017 at 18:53 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 78 characters in body
|
Dec 22, 2017 at 18:24 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
Dec 22, 2017 at 18:16 | history | answered | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |